Rawr 2.1.9.0

Rating:        Based on 29 ratings
Reviewed:  28 reviews
Downloads: 202466
Released: Jan 30, 2009
Updated: Dec 20, 2010 by Jothay
Dev status: Stable Help Icon

Recommended Download

Application Rawr v2.1.9.zip
application, 8621K, uploaded Jan 31, 2009 - 202466 downloads

Release Notes

v2.1.9:
Rawr is now accepting donations. Please use Tools > Donate, or goto https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=2451163 if you'd like to donate, to help accelerate the development of Rawr and its models. Thank you!
Updated parsing for a large number of trinkets/gems whose wording changed in WoW 3.0.8.
Support for (or more accurate support for) a variety of additional trinkets, in many models.
Fixed the data for a few profession bonuses which changed.
Updated the tooltips on all talents.
Tweaked the Relative Stat Values chart a bit to avoid some anomalies with rounding and stats which provide multiple benefits (ie, both Crit and AP from Agi for Cats).
Rawr.Cat/Bear: Fix for crit chance reduction against bosses, and fix for display of crit chance debuffs.
Rawr.Tree: Fixes for haste calculations
Rawr.Mage: Updates for WoW 3.0.8/hotfix changes. Added Scaling vs Spirit chart.
Rawr.RestoSham: Support for some glyphs, and more customizable healing rotations. Also enabled cloth/leather.
Rawr.ProtWarr: Major updates. Threat should be accurate, and a variety of minor fixes and additional options
Rawr.TankDK/DPSDK: Updated for 3.0.8 changes. A wide variety of major fixes and improvements.
Rawr.HolyPriest/ShadowPriest: Added optimizable values that you can create requirements for, or optimize for.
Rawr.Elemental: Initial release. Not fully complete yet, but included in this release of Rawr so that you can see how we're progressing. We still advise using Rawr.Elemental in conjunction with other theorycrafting tools.

Reviews for this release

     
Rawrs: there are no active devs for the rogue module. Making a 1/5 review isn't going to change that.
by wisk on Apr 13, 2009 at 11:36 AM
     
STILL no rogue release. Christ, how long does it take? DK is out already. What are the .Rogue devs doing?
by Rawrs on Apr 13, 2009 at 12:21 AM
     
Any chance of getting it easier to auto-create a list of best gear? So far I never managed to do it or get even close to it. I must be stupid P.S. Please add Earthen Leg Armor on leg enchants :) Cheers
by bugmenot2 on Apr 11, 2009 at 11:34 PM
     
The best development team i've seen in 3rd party WoW programming. I would love to see a little more data on where items drop(less unknowns), but dual thredding was the best thing to happen to Rawr optimizing the windows queue system. If programming is needed for any class let me know. Keep up the good work!
by mattster99 on Apr 2, 2009 at 8:26 PM
     
I absolutely love this tool. Gemming could be improved too. It has helped me save tons of time and it's fun to use. Everyone who relies on it should help contribute to it in some way. I'm not a techie so you guys will get my coffee and doughnut money for today. :)
by jfigursky on Mar 21, 2009 at 10:07 AM
     
just the talent builds alone were worth it.
by rosie1969 on Mar 16, 2009 at 9:21 PM
     
its good but theres no glyph of arcane missiles. I would think that 25% crit for arcane mages would be importent. but its cool
by docsaxx on Mar 16, 2009 at 9:17 AM
     
Very good...
by Chan10 on Feb 27, 2009 at 2:00 PM
     
It work for me too. Excellent !!!
by febuser26 on Feb 26, 2009 at 11:01 PM
     
I still do a great deal of calculating and experimenting myself. Rawr has minimized the time spent by a great deal. I would like PTR versions and some prot paladin fixes for it to be perfect for me.
by Jenovadin on Feb 19, 2009 at 12:18 AM
     
Fair tool with good mage support. But: 1) too slow. 2) why .NET? 3) the source code is a royal mess. 4) UI is too messy. 5) gemming needs improvements 6) so do filtering Please give it out with un-gemmed items, and with wotlk-only item db. my two cents.
by Selunae on Feb 18, 2009 at 7:45 AM
     
Overall a great theorycrafting tool, however lacking in a few spots. - Editing items (especially using the filter) can be slow & painful. - Please allow an option to exclude epic gems. I don't care if HelmA is better than my current helm when it has (unattainable) epic gems in it's slots.
by Wuumaster on Feb 10, 2009 at 8:13 PM
     
Missing a few recently added items. After using this application once you will come back again and again. Brilliant!
by baloo on Feb 10, 2009 at 3:19 AM
     
excellent tool, great mage modul, but yes, please improve the gem selection ;)
by eskimoe on Feb 10, 2009 at 1:19 AM
     
Wrong numbers in Tankadin.
by twirl on Feb 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM
     
I love this program, best thing that ever happened to my Mage, thanks mage team! keep up the good work all!
by Babatunde on Feb 5, 2009 at 3:48 PM
     
terrible gem implementation
by andz on Feb 5, 2009 at 12:31 AM
     
Great tool. Wish I had stumbled across this a long time ago, it would have saved me countless hours browsing all the theorycraft sites and all the wowarmory items. It's hands down the best complilation of the info that's out there, not to mention the great GUI, easy charts, and the coding behind the scene.
by djoser on Feb 4, 2009 at 6:10 PM
     
Its a tool, not a guide to dumming down gear selection. It may not be perfect but is funtional for evaluating upgrades for most classes. Sure it could be better but hell its free and they take an active roll in making it better all the time.
by Bigdogcc on Feb 4, 2009 at 2:51 PM
     
The application is awesome !!! But the commitment of Warlock team seems a lil bit messy.. :( Kind regards, John, // Answering to AstrotSD, this is the 1st time I try to use the program, and I had no chance to test it at all, but the apearance and GUI seems really good. Can't give 5 untill fully tested. Besides that I said on 1st post, Program is Awesome, guess you missed it. / kind regards /John
by johnny_um on Feb 4, 2009 at 12:05 PM
     
>>REVIEWS ARE NOT THE PLACE FOR BUG REPORTS OR QUESTIONS OR ISSUES<< johnny_um: Quite the contrary; the current Warlock team is progressing great, unlike the previous ones. Cainnech21: Read the readme. kain81073: That error means there's a problem with your system, not Rawr. You should be using the latest release, anyway, not building the codebase, unless you know what you're doing. wisk: Grats?
by AstrotSD on Feb 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM
     
Every time I attempt to run this I get a generic error that says "Rawr has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience". I have installed C# express and attempted to "Build" the latest source code, but it is riddled with errors as well and will not create an executable. Rating, of course, - 0.
by kain81073 on Feb 3, 2009 at 12:32 PM
     
I'm having a problem when trying to lunch the program when i have downloaded it i get an application error that states "the application failed to intialize properly (0xc0000135). click on ok to terminate the application." can someone tell me what the problem is so i can try and fix it? Cainnech
by Cainnech21 on Feb 2, 2009 at 8:36 PM
     
great mage support thx
by xmasman on Jan 31, 2009 at 4:18 PM
     
still no warlock module ,,,
by samaels on Jan 31, 2009 at 3:56 PM
     
This program is amazingly accurate for calculating the mechanics behind many classes in WoW. It's in heavy development constantly, and the devs are very active in getting feedback to the community and getting updates out as soon as WoW releases patches. This app and it's members are amazing, i love it, I'd give it a higher score but 5 is the max.
by Zifnab on Jan 31, 2009 at 1:20 AM
     
Only problem I noticed in 2.1.8 was the 4t6 feral druid set bonus was broken, and still is in 2.1.9. The buff page no longer checks the 4pc set bonus and as such, item values aren't calculated right when wearing 4 pieces.
by Lumis on Jan 31, 2009 at 1:15 AM
     
I really cant rate this Release with much accuracy at the moment. Simply because the DK module is now causing Rawr to crash. Check Discussions area to see Error Message Text. http://www.codeplex.com/Rawr/Thread/View.aspx?ThreadId=45732
by ezekial69 on Jan 30, 2009 at 6:34 PM